Noreascon 4 Exhibits Brainstorming

Now that Noreascon 4 is over, we will not be updating this blog any longer. For current information about Noreascon 4, see our home page or our main news weblog.

An Update from Jim Hudson

Last week, I took over the Exhibits Division from Laurie Mann, who's undergone FAFIA. She'll still be working for N4 in the Exhibits Division, but has too much pressure from work, etc., to continue as the division head.

All these ideas on reimagining the exhibits are good ones. We'll continue to try to work them into the plans, and would love more suggestions.

I also want to point out that an exhibit doesn't have to be just a bunch of material in a display case. Consider, for example, something as simple as having each case of Hugo rockets accompanied by a rolling computer display identifying the winners from those years, with pictures.

And the "Exhibit Hall" we've been discussing is actually a lot more -- it's also the main highway between the various parts of the convention, the central bar and lounge, the home of convention Information, the location for Site Selection voting, and a host of other things. It's probably where you'll arrange to see your friends, including the thousands you haven't met yet. So the Exhibits portions -- our museum -- have to mesh with all those other purposes.

Should be fun.

On Reimagining Worldcon Exhibits

From Laurie Mann
Exhibits Director, N4

We want to improve Exhibits organization, particularly
the fannish exhibits. Since we don't have much money
for displays, we tend to rely upon the cheap, tried and
true display methods such as arranging tables and
art show hangings in rectangles by subject. There
hasn't been a major change to the Exhibit Hall since
Exhibits first started about 30 years ago (with the
exception of the Concourse back in 1989, and the
one-shot golf course in 1992). For next year,
we want to dramatically improve the overall layout
and organization of the Exhibit Hall.

Worldcon exhibits have generally consisted of
little islands of topic areas (the Worldcon history area,
the fanzine area, the fan history area). We want
to reorganize exhibits in a different fashion.
Reorganizing them by time is one possibility. Picture,
if you will, the 1950s exhibit. This exhibit would include:

• timeline with highlights of the '50s
• photos/personalities from the '50s
• Hugo info from the '50s
• Worldcon, convention info/materials from the '50s
• fanzines from the '50s
• SF book/movie/TV info from the '50s
• a conversation nook
• a reference area - find out more

I want to stress that this organization by decade is
a preliminary idea. We need to spend some time
over the next few weeks discussing the hows and
whats of Exhibit reorganization. We don't want
to split things up arbitrarily, but we do want
to provide a better context for the material.
I suppose with my interest in history,
organizing material chronologically
makes the most sense to me, but I'm definitely
open to suggestions. As with Program,
we believe Exhibits can encourage conversation
among fans, both old and new.

Since we intend to reorganize existing materials,
we need to have a better idea of what's available
for display in the "warehouse" of fannish materials.
We will start to inventory and label materials currently in
storage in Massachusetts. We're going to develop
an online inventory of materials. Over the winter
and spring, we're going to use our inventory
database to determine which materials go into
each decade exhibit.

The idea is to focus on interesting material, label it
well so that both fans and non-fans alike understand
why the material is important to our field.

We also want to present the exhibits in a more appealing
way. To help us do that, we'll have some "proto-professional"
help from students at the New England School of Design
(http://www.suffolk.edu/nesad/). We'll go to
Worldcon with a more detailed exihibits layout than Worldcons
have had in the past. We believe this reorganization plan
has enormous potential to help make Exhibits more interesting.
Despite the extra work it will undoubtably require,
we're going to wind up with a more
engaging set of exhibits for Noreascon 4.

---

From Lauwrence C. Smith
Co-Manager of Dealers Room, N4

This is an excellent idea and way overdue.
Exhibits has been an orphan step-child for years--
it's not a glamor position and requires too much real
work to be a popular choice. As Exhibits Div Mgr
for ConJose, this was the hardest position I had
to fill; and the Dept Mgr is critical.

Doing it by decades is intelligent--it's how many of us
relate to our entry/position in the fannish timeline.

> The idea is to focus on interesting material, label it
> well so that both fans and non-fans alike understand
> why the material is important to our field.

And this point goes to the heart of the biggest current problem
I see in fandom--no replacements. Fandom is aging about
as fast as I am; when I got started in the mid 1960s,
there was a new fannish generation about every
three years and now I doubt if we are even getting
one-for-one replacements. Yes, there are lots more
compelling competing alternatives for proto-fan's
time and money which didn't exist when I was 20,
but we should still be able
to make organized fandom appealing.

---

From Patrick Molloy
Manager of NASA Exhibits and
Site Selection

To attempt to tie together the two areas I'm working... ;-)
If the exhibits are arranged chronologically, perhaps they
could lead the viewer through to the "future of fandom"
area, which would include the tables for the 2005 & 2006
Worldcons, the 2007 site selection area, and the future
worldcon bidders tables.

---

from Mike Nelson
50 Years of Hugo Exhibit

> I suppose with my interest in history, organizing material
> chronologically makes the most sense to me, but I'm
> definitely open to suggestions.

How many decades? 1930s to 1990s plus the 21st Century?

[[from Laurie: probably]]

If we organize things by decades, I'm tempted to suggest
that we include some real world events/milestones to help
in orienting people to the different time periods. Some
of these youngsters seem to picture the first moon landing
as science fiction. ;-)

By fannish Ages or Epoch?

The Reign of the Spirit Master
The Age of the Mimeograph
The Dawn of Xerography
The Digital Frontier

---

from Randy Smith
Exhibits Staff

First of all, I agree with Laurie that a re-organization
of the exhibits area is long overdue. I tend to go through
the exhibits pretty quickly, mostly because "I've seen all
that stuff before." Rearranging the material chronologically
will add interest for us "old-timers" (am I really in that
category now?)

[[from Laurie - you've been an assistant division director -
if you weren't an "old-timer" before, you've surely aged
into the position now! ;->]]

Laurie's idea reminds me a bit of Bucky when we did
the Fannish Desks exhibit, also organized by decade.
This would be much more comprehensive than that was,
and, I would think, should allow for more interesting
conversations by fans standing amidst the material.
Having conversation areas in each section is essential, IMHO.

Decade areas would have to include the '30s through
the '00s, at least. I could also see including a section for the
1920s, even though fandom in that decade was nothing like
it has been since, and it did not consider itself as a
larger organization. Certainly, it had not gained the status
of being a subculture that it had attained by the late 1930s.
Nevertheless, there were people doing things that today we
would classify as fanac, even if they themselves would
not have thought of it that way.

I really like the idea of including a Fandom In The 2010s section.

Certain issues will require difficult decisions:

How do we place fans into categories by decades when many
have fannish careers that span several?

Likewise, while some aspects of fannish culture come and
go (When was the last time you "liberated the pool?"),
others span several decades. Do we put an exhibit about
a particular fannish practice in the decade it began or
the decade when it was the most popular?

There is some value to categorizing displays by category
rather than time. Are there some exhibits we might want
to keep together, despite the fact that they span significant
lengths of time?

Would it be possible to include computer terminals with
fanhistory information on them so that people can learn
more while being in the midst of the exhibit?

[[from Laurie: The Fanhistory Exhibit has at least 2
laptops. And, if everything works out, we may wind up
with a wireless access area in Hall C (depending on
costs and the like).]]

On another note: I like the idea of including real-world
events in the exhibit as points of orientation. This can
work well if it is a well-planned exhibit. My only problem
with it is that it reminds me a bit of the Noreascon 3
board that had clippings of current events "outside the
convention" so that we could follow the news of the
"real world." As I recall, most of the clippings
were local news write-ups of the con or daily updates
of the then-ongoing trials of Zsa Zsa Gabor and Jimmy
Bakker. Granted, we will have the perspective of time
to look at past decades to decide what was really
important, but we still need to think carefully about it.

> Mike Nelson wrote:
> By fannish Ages or Epoch?
>
> The Reign of the Spirit Master
> The Age of the Mimeograph
> The Dawn of Xerography
> The Digital Frontier

While I like this idea a lot and it does make more
sense than organization strictly by decades, this particular
time-division seems to put just a bit too much emphasis
in fanzines.

What are some similar divisions by epoch that would be
more general in nature?

---

From Chaz Baden
Fan Photo Gallery Exhibit

Almost every single photo in the Fan Gallery is less than
7 years old... If we're agreed that trying to split up a
photo gallery exhibit into decades is a bit problematical,
then here's an idea I had for the Fan Gallery.

Suppose we made the exhibit something you walked
through, and perhaps lingered in? Instead of something
you walk around. Suppose we had more art show hangings,
we set them up facing inward instead of outward, and we
had a bench for people to linger on?

[[From Laurie: Yep, that's definitely the idea. In fact, Mike
Nelson's initial 50 Years of Hugo design was very much
in this spirit.]]

I've made a diagram of how the Fan Gallery was laid out
at Torcon 3, and a diagram of an idea for displaying the
same number of photos at Noreascon.

Torcon Layout

A Proposed N4 Layout

[[from Laurie: Yes!]]

At Torcon, the "footprint" of the exhibit was approximately
24 ft by 8 ft. The idea I've proposed above would use more
artshow fixtures, and would be approximately 32 ft by 18 ft.
(More space would be handy, natch; we're still adding photos
to the exhibit.)

[[from Laurie: Though if you had photos on both the inside and
outside, you could add more photos and still have a conversation
area. Note that most exhibits will probably wind up with less
space, because Hall C is smaller than many recent Worldcon
Exhibit Halls. And some exhibits/fan tables will probably wind
up in hallways.]]

Any chance of getting a big piece of carpet for the exhibit
to rest on, to help visually separate it from the aisles and
the rest of the hall?

(If we did that for all the exhibits, we could color code the
carpets...)

[[from Laurie: An interesting idea. Please put carpeting in
your "budget" if you want it and maybe it's something we
can add to contingency.]]

I'm thinking that the outside walls would have something
visually interesting hung on them - like patterned fabric,
or some sort of mural or other large art, or something.

One idea I had was to put a big sheet of butcher paper
on a table in the middle of the exhibit with a box of
crayons, and then at the end of the day hang the sheet
on the outside and put a fresh sheet down. But that
doesn't really relate to the Fan Gallery concept, so it's just a
free-floating idea that might fit somewhere else in the hall...

[[from Laurie: Ahh, the return of the Grafitti Board...]]